Saturday, December 6, 2008

Mission: Gain Land

Two completely different texts written in two completely different era’s aren’t usually thought of as having a common base, however, In Niccolo Machiavelli’s guide The Prince, written in 1513, a standard formation of the rules of the land in which Tennessee William’s Pulitzer Prize Winning Play, Cat On a Hot Tin Roof, first presented in 1955, follows. Machiavelli states many important “rules” for one to gain land, keep land, and how to get from one step to the next. William’s play is about a southern family attempting to maintain their land by deciding which son will inherit it. Manipulation, greed, conspiracy, death and family are main keys to maintaining land in any country at any time, Machiavelli wrote the guide book for any prince where as Williams follows the guides throughout his play.
Land is usually given to the first born son, in Cat On A Hot Tin Roof, the older brother, Gooper, should have gained the estate from Big Daddy, however, younger brother, Brick is chosen for title of the land. Machiavelli states, “All principalities for which some record exists have been ruled…by a prince with barons holding title not by his grace but by right of inheritance. In states which are governed by a prince and his servants, the prince has greater authority because no one in his land recognizes anyone but him as master” (26). This translating into the idea that someone in line to inherit land is not determined by their personality rather by their right to inheritance, so why is the younger brother given opportunity to gain instead of the oldest son? Big Daddy says to Brick, “I thought about you. Should I or should I not, if the jig was up, give you this place when I go— since I hate Gooper an’ Mae an’ know that they hate me. —And I thought, No! —Then I thought, Yes! I couldn’t make up my mind. I hate Gooper and his five same monkeys and that bitch Mae! Why should I turn over twenty-eight thousand acres of the richest land this side of the valley Nile to not my kind” (112). Big Daddy’s decision is based on wants, not needs. His land would be in much better hands if his first-born son acquired it, as it usually is, however, he wants his second son, Brick, to own the land. Machiavelli believes the prince has the greatest power, in Cat on A Hot Tin Roof, Brick is the prince, everyone in the household knows he is in line for the estate, this makes everyone around him his servants, not physically, but financially. The money will belong to him and the family’s well-being will be up to him.



Power is a strong lesson to learn. Brick has the most power in this situation, even though Big Daddy has the control of who to give the estate to, Brick has the influence needed to steer Big Daddy’s decision. The family would be considered the mob in Machiavelli’s opinion, and when someone controls the mob, all goes well. However, this is a modern-day situation in Cat on a Hot Tin Roof. The women in this play are outspoken, yet not independent. They still obey their husbands and elders, like a mob would have done in the 1500’s. Machiavelli writes, “For the mob is always impressed by appearances and by results; and the world is composed of the mob” (70). This is directly related to the women in the house. They each want appearances to stay upheld. Big Mama wants her son, Brick, to maintain their southern roots when he takes over the land. Maggie wants to live the life of luxury and the only way is to convince her husband, Brick, to procreate and accept the land from Big Daddy. Mae, on the other hand, being the wife of Gooper, would like nothing more than her husband to gain the land. Mae and Gooper are the conspirators, the antagonists, attempting to move up in society (in this case, society is the family).
All people in power have a chance of being over thrown, either by family or enemies and Cat on a Hot Tin Roof is no exception. Gooper and Mae are determined to cause a rift in Big Daddy and Brick, allowing Gooper to inherit the land. Gooper has every right to want the estate. He is the first-born son, is much more responsible than Brick, has five children, and with one more on the way, is obviously the best candidate for title to the land. Machiavelli writes, “The worst he can fear from a hostile people is to be abandoned by them, but from a hostile nobility he must fear not only being abandoned but also being attacked” (44). The people who would attack Brick are his brother and sister-in-law, not physically, but emotionally, verbally, or conspire against him. Gooper and Mae know they are better for the land, so throughout the entire play, the two attempt to change Big Daddy’s mind—but to no avail. Big Daddy still plans on handing the land over to Brick. Machiavelli’s advice is very informational and would have handled well if given to Brick. As stated in Chris Barker’s “Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice” regarding Derrida’s term logocentrism, “by ‘logocentrism,’ Derrida means the reliance on fixed a priori transcendental meanings, that is universal meanings, concepts and forms of logic that exist within human reason before any other kinds of thinking occur” (84). Machiavelli’s ideas terming the prince are universal, in any situation these guidelines and “rules” exist and are practiced before any new ideas enter the situation, one always relies on existing theories and the family of Cat on a Hot Tin Roof does just that.



As mentioned in Cultural Studies Raymond Williams was quoted, “Culture is both constitutive and expressive of a social totality of human relations and practices” (57). Our culture has set limits regarding relationships of economic, gender and class systems. Maggie, being a woman, has the relationship of economic, gender and class regarding her inability to inherit anything. This role is left to the men in that culture. Gooper and Brick are the only heirs to inherit the land, had it been one male and one female, there is no doubt the female would be ignored as a candidate of inheritance. Barker then states in response to Williams, “By this he means that the economic sets limits to what can be done or expressed in culture. However, it does not determine the meaning of cultural practices in a direct one-to-one relationship” (57). This would explain why in private, Maggie and Brick switch roles. One-to-one relationships challenge common ideologies regarding roles. Maggie is the sexually aggressive mate where as Brick is the emotional partner drinking his way to contentment.


If there is an unspoken rule on gender roles regarding inheritance, does everyone automatically understand the rules or is it forced upon us when the timing needs to. The most common rule in both The Prince and Cat on a Hot Tin Roof regarding inheritance states the oldest son receives the largest amount of land and funds. It is evident as Big Daddy makes his own rule by choosing which son receives the land and funds that, as stated above, one-to-one relationships don’t always follow conventional rules. The characters in this play break all conventionalities.
Barker then states, “The further cultural practices are away from the core capitalist production process, the more they can operate autonomously” (57). His brilliant example is the idea of “individually produced art [being] more autonomous than mass-produced television” (57). Big Daddy and his family are away from the core capitalist production process because they operate their family as they please. Breaking common expectations allows them to be an individual household that stands out from the usual picture the perfect southern family makes.
Barker defines structuralism as “describing social formations as constituted by complex structures or regularities. It is concerned with how cultural meaning is produced” (57). This idea can be directed to Cat on a Hot Tin Roof’s Maggie character. She breaks the social formations of the submissive housewife by wearing tight skinned clothing and being aggressive towards her husband, mother-in-law and father-in-law about property ownership. However, the biggest situation in which she breaks social formations is her approach to children. She doesn’t want to have them, she even hates them, but knows she and Brick have better odds of gaining the land if they had a son, therefore she attempts to convince Brick into impregnating her. Usually socially formed women start wanting children once married; it is engrained in women to have children. If one chooses not to, they are questioned why. Brick also battles social constraints by drinking himself until he feels the “click” meaning everything will be all right. He hobbles around all day, drinking as much as he can, ignoring his wife’s needs and his parent’s wishes. Although his father idolizes him and his mother considers him her only son, Brick can’t realize what an opportunity he is given. To own his father’s land would set him up for life and he and Maggie would be stable financially.

Michael Foucault is known for his interpretations on human sexuality and its constraints. His text, The History of Sexuality states, “Three major explicit codes—apart from the customary regularities and constraints of opinion—governed sexual practices: canonical law, the Christian pastoral, and civil law” (683). Civil law is emphasized in the two texts, yet canonical and Christian pastoral laws also make a big influence throughout The Prince. Civil laws regulate society in the old South, and the civil law states how each individual should behave. Women have their submissive roles that make them follow behind their husbands, while men have their role of inheriting their father’s estates and making a name for themselves.

Foucault symbolized the “laws” of society and which aspects should be followed. The civil law reiterates the notions of expectations every individual has, and it is used throughout Cat on a Hot Tin Roof. Barker’s views on ideas regarding social constraints and one-to-one relationships restricting actual social limitations and Machiavelli’s notion of grace as a weighing mechanism in determining what is right and who is rightful to inherit are evident in the play. All of these texts point to one common issue: rules and roles of society can change at any moment and by any person. Big Daddy chooses the unconventional younger son to inherit the land. Maggie is the aggressive partner in her marriage with Brick. Yet, they are all under one roof, supporting the idea of family, however broken it may be.

According to Machiavelli, the more heirs one has, the better the chances of securing one’s lineage and land. Brick understands this and eventually gives into his wife’s demands by procreating a child. He may be an alcoholic and a has-been football player, but he has one thing his older brother will never have: the grace needed to get what he wants. His ‘grace’ is appreciated by his mother and father, allowing their decision to feel correct; one may ask if they are making the right choice, and from an outsider’s viewpoint, the answer may be no; but Big Daddy and Big Mama love their youngest son and denounce the oldest son. Grace allowed Brick to strive; order of birth ruined Gooper’s chances of gaining what is considered rightfully his. Machiavelli’s guidelines are relative from the 16th century to present day American life, and I think he’d be proud to see his words of advice rewarding.

Works Cited

Barker, Chris. “Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice.” Third Edition. Sage Publications. Los Angeles. 2008

Foucault, Michael. The History of Sex. Handout. 683-691.
Machiavelli, Niccolo. The Prince. Ed. Daniel Donno. Bantam Classic. New York. 2003.

Williams, Tennessee. Cat on a Hot Tin Roof. New Directions Books. New York. 1975.

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Plastic Melts

Southern California as we know it has become as fake as breast implants. Everyone is looking for a way to "enhance" their appearance, whether it be botox, breast augmentation, liposuction, penis enlargement, vaginal rejuvenation, the list goes on. The point is as Susan Bardo states in her essay, "Material Girl: The Effacements of Postmodern Culture,"(Women are never happy with themselves) If we are never happy with ourselves, it is implied, that is due to ouor female nature, not to be taken too seriously or made into a 'political question'" (1102). This epidemic of making oneself better than what we origionally are is never going to end until something changes the way individuals view themselves.

It can be argued that self image is passed down from generation to generation or it is controlled by the media and what it "in" at a given moment in time. During the 20's it was the Flapper Scene, the 50's and 60's Greasers, 60's and 70's Hippies; but in the 2000's.... the quest to look perfect? Many women and men go to extremes to look perfect, but who is it that determines what is perfect?

I think we should have a long and hard conversation with those making the criterian for perfectness. Perhaps feed them more than they are used to, knock them around a little bit, suggest counseling. If anyone has anyother suggestions, let me know :)

Monday, November 24, 2008

"Green World" a No No

For the first time this semester, I do not know what to discuss about chapter 14 of
Barker.

The one item that caught my eye is on page 467 is the question "Can we describe the
Green movement as a New Social Movement?" I believe we can.... The 'Green
Movement' is occuring more rapidly due to knowledge of the damages we as society are
causing. However, I think in the midst of awareness, I believe we are still causing more
damage. The news travels by waves to our radios, by cords and plugs to our televisions
or by paper through the papers.

We are causing harm by trying to prevent it. How can we stop the issues on this earth?
There will never be a "green" world, we have become too accustomed to how we live and
are too stubborn to give up our resources.

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

You're As Young Or As OLD as You think

"The Ambiguity of Youth".... this is such a great sub-title in Barker's Chapter 11, "Youth, Style, and Resistance." Youth can mean so many things, innocence, naivity, freedom, captivity, non-responsible. Many people look back to their childhood and wish for it again. Yet others are glad to older and wiser. Barker states, "However we seek to define it, youth remains an ambiguous concept" (409).

Peter Pan didn't want to grow up.... Wendy knew she needed to. Which is right? Living a lifetime of childhood would be great to many people, yet enjoying your childhood, then moving onto adulthood isn't so bad either. Barker continues to write, "Youth has been an ideological signifier charged with utopian images of the future" (409).

Is it the naivity or innocence of youth to view the world in a Utopian image? I think it's the innocence of childhood causing children to view the world as equal. When young we're always taught 'share your toys', 'say please', 'be nice', yet when we are older it's, don't share, rent out; I want it now; and it's all about me.

Youth is the time of innocence and equality, so I leave you now with the questions, "When do youth's eyes open to reality?" and "Who or what opened their eyes?"

Monday, November 17, 2008

Cyberspace as a Get Away

We all know those individuals who seem to vanish behind closed doors and escape reality into the world of cyberspace. Whether it be a friend, relative a significant other or yourself, everyone knows someone who attracts to the anonymity of a new identity where communication exists with the click of a mouse and the creation of a character.

Therapy sessions used to be between an individual needing advice and a professional looking to give it, however, nowadays, therapy sessions involve expressing oneself by becoming something else and acting through it online. Barker states, "It is argued that by enabling players to mask their worldly identites, virtual space allows a range of identity performances that are not tied to material bodies" (360). Do we now have different personalities? Does everyone who becomes addicted to cyberspace have Multiple Personality Disorder and their personalities are released via video games, chat rooms, blogs even.

Barker continues to state, "The problem, of course, is that actors in cyberspace remain tied to the everyday material world whose impact on the virtual universe persists" (360). Are there certain traits in an individual who fall into the supremacy of loss of identity. Does social class lead to the need to express oneself via a character? If someone is in a low-paying dead-end job and wants to pretend they have a million dollars, why not behave like the person you want to be where no one knows the real you. It's reality versus fantasy; one can pretend to be anything or anyone they want with no consequences.
A world of make believe can be all someone wants to believe in. They can forget about the reality of things, and lock themselves in cyberspace to become what they really want to be.

Friday, November 14, 2008

"Women are as Fucked a Group as Ever" in Five Minutes of "Something's Gotta Give"

Casondra Colizzi
English 313
Dr. Wexler
November 18, 2008
Movie Clip: Something’s Gotta Give
Writer/ Director: Nancy Meyers


“Women are as Fucked a Group as Ever in Five Minutes of Something’s Gotta Give”

Erika Berry is a talented and successful playwright in Nancy Meyers Film Something’s Gotta Give. When her daughter brings over an older boyfriend, 40 years her senior, Erika finds herself having to make reasons as to why she is still a divorcee. Older women who are not married or widowed are questioned as to why they never remarried, but as in this scene, older men, especially the lucky one’s like Harry Sanborn, are praised for never having been married. Women are still considered spinsters and hags if they don’t share their bed with the same man after a certain age. Society is supposed to be in a progression towards equality, yet even in a romantic comedy, the presupposed notions of the bachelor and the spinster are still strongly evident. Zoe, Erika’s sister, plays the narrator in this scene for viewers to recognize the underlying notion of this film: Women are as fucked a group as ever. Although women are as successful as men, and are treated much better now than before the women’s movement, we still must fall into certain conventions regarding marital status. Even though our paychecks are as high as men, our lifelong struggle for equality still must be fought, American society still portrays the idea of women having to be married in order to be successful, but the question still states, “Why do I have to defend this time in my life?” Women will forever be defending why or why not they are living the way they are, whether it be career-wise, single, or childless; society is still living in a pre-women’s movement era, and will be this way until everyone recognizes the ties still on younger and older women living their lives in the style they choose.

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Fordism-- Selective Wages

Fordism... interesting. As stated by Barker, "The post-1945 economies of the western world, and especially of Britain and America, have been dominated by 'Fordism' as an economic practice and Keynesianism as the economic policy of nation-states." Keynesianism, as defined by Wikipedia, is a means that "the state can stimulate economic growth and improve stability in the private sector - through, for example, interest rates, taxation and public projects." Between Fordism and Keynesianism, societies could begin earning top dollar for their labor-- however, Barker also states who deserves the top dollar.... white men!!!

After reading this section regarding the need to pay 'core-laborers' top dollar in order for the workers to afford top dollar products, I realized the manipulation in these words. Who are 'core-laborers' in a factory? Well, not women. Barker continues to say, "A system of relatively high wages, at least for core workers, in order to sustain the purchasing of high-volume production. Allied to a relatively well-paid core-labour force was a low-wage sector in which women and people of colour were over-represented." The big-time companies wanted to be represented by their items being sold... so of course the people buying them are selective. If a company wants to be viewed in a certain way, they would want only certain people buying their products. And if a company has control over how much their workers make, and they want their workers to afford certain products, then the company will give higher wages to their workers who qualify into the realm of acceptability. (Of course, this is only what the company considers acceptable).

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Contact Me

My e-mail address is:

c_colizzi@yahoo.com
If an economy is described as it's culture and influenced by the economic history a city proclaims, then what is to say a city isn't also described as its residents?

If a city has a bustling economy, that means there are many jobs to fulfill. As stated in Barker, "The culture industries, including film, television, advertising agencies and the music business lend galmour to cities, bringing direct employment and other economic benefits" (386). A city is made up of it's history, opportunities and those who take advantage of those opportunities.

However, the history of a city seems to continue into the present and the future: men excluding women and those who only want women for sex.
The first is the flaneur, which is a male figure who traveled through areas of town in which women are not allowed. And the second is the "flaneur's" gaze; which is usually frequent and towards an erotic woman.

I find it intersting that a city is described by it's history, people and jobs; and the people seem to support the cities needs to continue bustling.

Television as Inspirational

Women, men and children have been watching more and more television in recent years, and with that increase is also the increase of imitation of what is seen on the t.v. shows. Soap operas, for example, are DRAMATIC; murder, illicit children, abuse, and conpsiracies. Barker describes soap operas as "Open-ended narrative forms; Soap opera, as a long-running serial, has a potentially unlimited time period in which to tell its stories. There is not the sense of closure to be found in the feature film or the 13-episode series" (322). Soap operas are only stories, yet some who are obsessed with watching these shows, will findthey would like to live in theis lifestyle full of drama.

News stations are a means for the world to know what is going on. But when the media controls which version of the truth we see, any version of the news is questionable, as Barker states, "News is not an unmediated 'window-on-the-world' but a selected and constructed representation constitutive of 'reality'" (316). In the newest pun on Disney movies, "Enchanted" takes what is usually charming and places it into the real world, yet the characters find themselves confused and lost in this new world. Prince Edward seeks truth on where his fiance is, so when the magical mirror turns on, or the television, all of his questions are answered. His side man also watches the televsion and soap operas. One in particular encouraged the side man to turn in the witch and do what was best for everyone.

Television is known for inspiring change, even characters in movies are protraying that change. But in reality, women, men and children are yet still attempting to immitate what is seen on television. Shows such as "America's Next Top Model," "The Janice Dickinson Modeling Agency," and others make other women want to be like those 2% of tiny and beautiful women. Television shows may be positive on ones life, such as cooking shows and do-it-yourself programs, but others can be a challenge to those trying to make it in society.

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Romantic Comedies are Negatively Influencing Society

What has become of the popular genre "Romantic Comedy?" When two individuals used to run into eachother and have chemistry, sexual tension was evident, even suggested with puns intended. However, nowadays, romantic comedies enlist sexual tendencies in every situation where boy meets girl. Mc Donald says, "Rapturous sex is thus portrayed as something immature, something not a lot like love, whichfilm implies is based more on shared conersation, disappointments and compromises than heady physical pleasure" (98). I completely disagree with this statement. Films now have so much nudity and sex, it's hard not to call them porn. Rarely do romantic comedies not have steamy sex scenes and over the top make out sessions.

Why have fun, innocent movies with happily ever afters turned into raunchy, one night stands that turn into a love interest. This genre has a negatively unrealistic outcome in which viewers then believe their next love interest and future husband or wife will be a random hook up. Is this new version or "neo-traditional romantic comedy" the newest version of brainwashing? Individuals will now be inspired to make themselves "available" to anyone, because who knows if the next fling they wake up to will be their one and only....

Thursday, October 9, 2008

The oppressed will break out

After reading Foucault's "The History of Sex," I felt a common idea is proven yet again. When people are opressed and forbidden to not do something, it will cause sme of those people to act out in a worse fashion than if they had been allowed to behave the way they wanted to in the first place. When sex is translated through three main ideas, "canonical law, the Christian pastoral, and civilian law" you know something is wrong. Sex should be a bond between two people who have feelings for eachother, yet in the Victorian Age, even a married couple must use sex for procreation or on certain days and no other reason. What a waste of sexuality.

When boundries are placed to these extents, it makes some people lash out in other ways. Foucault writes, "Whence the setting apart of the "unnatural" as a specific dimension in teh field of sexuality. this kind of activity assumed an autonomy with regard to the other condemned forms such as adultery or rape (and the latter were condemned less and less)." Because individuals are taught that sex is a dirty act, they begin finding other ways to please themselves. This is where it goes wrong, had society been taught that sex was a natural act, one wouldn't find other more disgusting ways of pleasing themselves, such as rape, adultery, sodomy and incest.

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

"The Prince" Has Worldwide Advice

Two completely different texts written in two completely different era’s aren’t usually thought of as having a common base, however, In Niccolo Machiavelli’s guide “The Prince,” written in 1513, is a standard formation of the rules of the land in which Tennessee William’s Pulitzer Prize Winning Play, Cat On a Hot Tin Roof, first presented in 1955, follows. Machiavelli states many important “rules” for one to gain land, keep land, and how to get from one step to the next. William’s play is about a southern family attempting to maintain their land by deciding which son will inherit it. Manipulation, greed, conspiracy, death and family are main keys to maintaining land in any country at any time, Machiavelli wrote the guide book for any prince where as Williams follows the guides throughout his play.

Land is usually given to the first born son, in Cat On A Hot Tin Roof the older brother, Gooper, should have gained the estate from Big Daddy, however, younger brother, Brick is chosen for title of the land. Machiavelli states, “All principalities for which some record exists have been ruled…by a prince with barons holding title not by his grace but by right of inheritance. In states which are governed by a prince and his servants, the prince has greater authority because no one in his land recognizes anyone but him as master” (26). This translating into the idea that someone in line to inherit land is not determined by their personality rather by their right to inheritance, so why is the younger brother given opportunity to gain instead of the oldest son? Big Daddy says to Brick, “I thought about you. Should I or should I not, if the jig was up, give you this place when I go— since I hate Gooper an’ Mae an’ know that they hate me. —And I thought, No! —Then I thought, Yes! I couldn’t make up my mind. I hate Gooper and his five same monkeys and that bitch Mae! Why should I turn over twenty-eight thousand acres of the richest land this side of the valley Nile to not my kind” (112). Big Daddy’s decision is based on wants, not needs. His land would be in much better hands if his first-born son acquired it, as it usually is, however, he wants his second son, Brick, to own the land. Machiavelli believes the prince has the greatest power, in Cat on A Hot Tin Roof, Brick is the prince, everyone in the household knows he is in line for the estate, this makes everyone around him his servants, not physically, but financially. The money will belong to him and the family’s well-being will be up to him.

Power is a strong lesson to learn. Brick has the most power in this situation, even though Big Daddy has the control of who to give the estate to, Brick has the influence needed to steer Big Daddy’s decision. The family would be considered the mob in Machiavelli’s opinion, and when someone controls the mob, all goes well. However, this is a modern-day situation in Cat on a Hot Tin Roof. The women in this play are outspoken, yet not independent. They still obey their husbands and elders, like a mob would have done in the 1500’s. Machiavelli writes, “For the mob is always impressed by appearances and by results; and the world is composed of the mob” (70). This is directly related to the women in the house. They each want appearances to stay upheld. Big Mama wants her son, Brick, to maintain their southern roots when he takes over the land. Maggie wants to live the life of luxury and the only way is to convince her husband, Brick, to procreate and accept the land from Big Daddy. Mae, on the other hand, being the wife of Gooper, would like nothing more than her husband to gain the land. Mae and Gooper are the conspirators, the antagonists, attempting to move up in society (in this case, society is the family).


All people in power have a chance of being over thrown, either by family or enemies and Cat on a Hot Tin Roof is no exception. Gooper and Mae are determined to cause a rift in Big Daddy and Brick, allowing Gooper to inherit the land. Gooper has every right to want the estate. He is the first-born son, is much more responsible than Brick, has five children, and with one more on the way, is obviously the best candidate for title to the land. Machiavelli writes, “The worst he can fear from a hostile people is to be abandoned by them, but from a hostile nobility he must fear not only being abandoned but also being attacked” (44). The people who would attack Brick are his brother and sister-in-law, not physically, but emotionally, verbally, or conspire against him. Gooper and Mae know they are better for the land, so throughout the entire play, the two attempt to change Big Daddy’s mind—but to no avail. Big Daddy still plans on handing the land over to Brick. Machiavelli’s advice is very informational and would have handled well if given to Brick. As stated in Chris Barker’s “Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice” regarding Derrida’s term logocentrism, “by ‘logocentrism,’ Derrida means the reliance on fixed a priori transcendental meanings, that is universal meanings, concepts and forms of logic that exist within human reason before any other kinds of thinking occur” (84). Machiavelli’s ideas terming the prince are universal, in any situation these guidelines and “rules” exist and are practiced before any new ideas enter the situation, one always relies on existing theories and the family of Cat on a Hot Tin Roof does just that.
According to Machiavelli, the more heirs one has, the better the chances of securing one’s lineage and land. Brick understands this and eventually gives into his wife’s demands by procreating a child. He may be an alcoholic and a has-been football player, but he has one thing his older brother will never have: the grace needed to get what he wants. His ‘grace’ is appreciated by his mother and father, allowing their decision to feel correct; one may ask if they are making the right choice, and from an outsider’s viewpoint, the answer may be no; but Big Daddy and Big Mama love their youngest son and denounce the oldest son. Grace allowed Brick to strive; order of birth ruined Gooper’s chances of gaining what is considered rightfully his. Machiavelli’s guidelines are relative from the 16th century to present day American life, and I think he’d be proud to see his words of advice rewarding.



Works Cited

Barker, Chris. “Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice.” Third Edition. Sage Publications. Los Angeles. 2008

Machiavelli, Niccolo. The Prince. Ed. Daniel Donno. Bantam Classic. New York. 2003.
Williams, Tennessee. Cat on a Hot Tin Roof. New Directions Books. New York. 1975.

Thursday, September 25, 2008

If Woman is the Oven, What is man?

This topic came about while I was working last night when a fellow co-worker said the
man at the bar wouldn't let her serve him because he only likes the male bartenders (not
in a gay-way). She was very frustrated at this notion and vented to me and two other
male co-workers. One of their responses was (jokingly) that women should be at home
making babies while her husband is out working and providing for them.


Then he continued to say "you're an oven, so baby, bake!!!" It was all a joke, but I
began thinking, ok, if the phrase is "She has a bun in the oven," what is the male
providing? Is he the flavoring in the bun, the ingredients? Just as "Sex, Gender and
Identity" mentions in Chapter 9 of Chris Barker's "Cultural Studies, "Common sense
ecompasses a form of biological reductionism suggesting that the biochemical and
genetic structures of human beings determine the behaviour of men and women in quite
different adn specific ways" (285). This is an understatement.


Now-a-days, women are not seeking the "male specified, common sense, role of
provider" in order to gain a child. They are now seeking "role of sperm donor." It is not
that many women are just seeking to get pregnant and not need a man to support them,
but in many situations, women, well, don't need a man to support them and just want to
have a family. Is this wrong? I think not. If a man is measured by only his wallet size,
what does that say of our society? That we are shallow....


If a man is measured by the caring and involvement of his family and support of his
loved ones, he is not masculine? I believe the double standard is begining to reverse its
roles. Women are seen as powerful if they can have a family of their own without the
financial support of a man, where as men are seen as deadbeats if they leave the mother
of their children.


Roles of men and women are changing, with the common, stay at home dad, or full-time
mother who is also working full-time in the workforce. And all I can say is that it's about
time :)

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

While working at the restaurant, I observed a few couples at each of my tables. The one
that caught my eye the most was a older man (around 70) and his young girlfriend with a
young child in her arms. Throughout their dinner, the older man was comforting her while
also attempting to make her happy.... She seemed to be somewhat irritated with him and
he was just letting her do her thing.

It took me a few moments to figure out if they were actually a couple or just relatives,
but I then understood he was in fact her significant other.

Upon their meal, he was explaining something to her and trying to keep her attention,
but she was occuppied with other things (her daughter). She even shushed me when I
asked if they wanted some coffee because her daughter was sleeping.


I realized he was talking about his age, "I'm not 24 years old..." and she was just
listening. I also got the impression she was questioning him on some topic where she
sounded somewhat insecure. You know the old saying, "out with the old, and in with the
new," but in this case, who is being replaced, him with a younger man, or her with a
younger woman.... But, who knows what the full conversation was regarding, but the two
were there for a good hour and a half (due to needs of the baby).


Their body language was intense: he was all about her, she was all about the baby. I felt
kind of bad because you can tell he was trying to pour his heart out to her and she
wasn't having it.


They eventually left the restaurant, she first holding thier child, then he walking slowly
behind.

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Sex Comedies: The Battle Royal Begins

Throughout history the idea that women like sex... or moreso can crave it just as men do has baffled any conservative man and woman in that case into disbelief. Three first and breakthrough literary works, including movies, that depict the idea of breaking down the wall named taboo on the topic of women having sex before marriage and the enjoyment of this biological and natural act are: 1) Alfre Kinsey's publication on "Sexual Behaviour in the Human Female (August 1953) 2) Playboy Magazine 3) the movie, "The Moon is Blue." All three of these were crucial to the development of the term "virginal" or "experienced." McDonald states, "The word 'sex' in the generic title might be seen to be doing double duty there: to indicate the participants in the skirmish (sex as gender) adn to denote the battle field (sex as sex). The 1950's-- 1960's sex comedies could in fact be called 'Battle of teh Sexes comedies.'" (43-44).

McDonald reiterates the notion that in sex comedies, sex is used as a weapon. The virginal girl is constantly guarding her battle ground (untouched virginalness) where as man is in constant attack mode upon her battle ground (PUN INTENDED). The men are always going after either the girl they know will give it up or the girl they know will not be such as easily conquered. Why is this?

I think Romantic Comedies have evolved over the years, yet still have the same ideas of a battleground of control and sex. The one with the control being the person not giving 'it' up. The temptress is still usually the woman, the victim/ persuer is still usually the man. Now, why would I say victim?

I believe in many situations, women use the power they have to manipulate and toy with a perspective mate. Knowing we have the power to turn a man into mulch is very exciting and in many movies and real life, this idea is being used and practiced. Men can be victims if the prowl and attempt goes unappreciated (that is if the woman doesn't give it up or if they show no interest at the end). For now, Sex Comedies are still rocking our worlds....

Jerry McGuire as a Romantic Comedy....??

It states in "Romantic Comedy: BOy Meets Girl Meets Genre" that Jerry McGuire is
considered a romantic comedy. I have to beg to differ, I believe it is closer to a romantic
drama. The funniest part of the film was the little boy making random coments.

"A Romantic Comedy is a film which has as its central narrative motor a quest for love,
which portrays this quest in a light-hearted way and almost always to a successful
conclusion" (9). The film may be a quest for love, but love of what? First it was Jerry's
love and passion in his mission statement to have fewer clients and make less money,
then it was his love for his only client, then love for the only person who believed in him>
hence probably why he became interested in her.

Jerry McGuire should not be considered a romantic comedy only because while a man
who is lost finds a girl who is infactuated with him. Is he selfish? I think so... and because
he is selfish, he eventually gets the girl back and his career back as well.

Monday, September 15, 2008

"Cat on a Hot Tin Roof" contribution







While reading Tennessee William's Cat on a Hot Tin Roof, two questions continued to arise: Was Brick reacting to his friend's death by drinking himself dead, and is it truly important to Brick and Maggie to save face and make appearances seem blissful to the outside world? When this play was assigned, I immediately thought of Anne Proulx and Larry McMurtry's film, Brokeback Mountain. Both men were hiding a relationship, they each had wives and children and jobs but were miserable until their romantic get aways with one another. However, both wives, eventually caught onto the affair these two men were having. Maggie shares the jelousy and love/hate feelings towards her husband as Alma and Lureen feel towards their husbands.

Is it possible to save face, or does everyone find out the skeletons hidden in the closets? Their wives finally breakdown and confront the men on their "secret," the only main difference in the two stories is that Brick does not admit to his being gay whereas Ennis and Jack are openly gay (to themselves).

It was also interesting for me to compare and contrast the two wives in Brokeback Mountain to the wife in Cat on a Hot Tin Roof. Maggie is an outspoken woman who seems to be staying in a loveless marriage because of financial security. However, she is put into her place when mentioning Skipper, Brick's friend, when Brick begins attacking her with his crutches. She is yelling at him while also dodging flying objects. Lureen is a wealthy woman born into the lap of luxury where as Alma is just as poor as Ennis. It is evident Lureen is not as in love with Jack as Alma is with Ennis. Alma attempts to make her husband happy, because the man is in charge of the household, whereas Lureen is the main breadwinner and Jack is married into this wealthy lifestyle. She is more of an independent and assertive woman, whereas Alma is dependent and passive. The two women are different and I believe Maggie is a mixture of the two. She is spunky, yet knows her financial dependence of Brick.


In our group project, I contributed by creating two backup questions in case our class discussion is not as productive as planned. I also am going to be introducing our group and its main topics as well as addressing the class regarding the term mendacity and saving face with back up material from a modern film, Brokeback Mountain, with same issues: loveless marriages and questioning sexuality. Along with this, I wrote an outline of our presentation and posted it onto our file in WebCT for the group to have a sense of what the process will be.




Thursday, September 11, 2008

Throughout the play "Cat on a Hot Tin Roof" Tenessee Williams' characters reinstate the
burden a cat on a hot tin roof would have. Why would a cat stay on a hot roof knowing
they can jump off onto safe ground? Does the feline like the pressure on their paws?
Probably not. But if they are on the 12th floor, they are not going to jump knowing they
would plummet to their death. Just as the women and men in this play stay in an
uncomfortable situation, their marriages. Brick and Maggie stay together even though
both are miserable. She want's his attention and he could care less. Just like his parents,
Big Mamma and Big Daddy, who are both in a loveless marriage. Although Big Mamma
loves Big Daddy so much, he could care less. He is verbally and physically abusive and
she gets over it as quick as possible. He publically humiliates her infront of family and
close friends in the community.
Big Mamma is constantly saying to her daughter-in-laws to not be catty. Their references
are always regarding cats, "Don't be catty" "LIke a cat on a hot tin roof." If being a cat is
so dangerous, I'd rather be a dog.

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

"What is a Woman?" -- Simone De Beauvoir

Just as Saussure believed every society has a premandated image for each word, Simone de Beauvoir believes images are engrained into our psyche from birth of gender roles and lack there of. De Beauvoir states in, "The Second Sex," "What is a woman? 'Totamulier in utero' [or] 'woman is a womb.'" Woman have been attempting to even the battle field with their masculine counterpart by attempting to become masculine as well. She also stated, "Are there really women?"
If women are continuously attempting to change the image of what gender roles are, what then constitues a woman from a man besides physical differences? I immeditely think of woman weightlifters and body builders. Some are accused of taking steroids in order to reach their ideal body image, but in the long run, a woman begins to trade her feminine frame for a masculine, non-curvy solid form. Is this not a major form of equalizing the battle field of male and female? I think women and men are supposed to look different for a reason, because we are different. We have different functions, physically, mentally and emotionally. I am not saying a woman should be in the home raising babies and making dinner while the man should be working in the world. I merely believe woman and men are meant to conquer different obstacles in different ways.
Another example of signs being mental images in our psyche that, as Saussure has suggested, relates a sound image automatically, depending on what society you are born in, is the use of clothing. Women are expected to wear certain attire while men are expected to adhere to a different attire.
De Bouvior states, "In truth, to go for a walk with one's eyes open is enough to demonstrate that humanity is divided into two classes of individuals whose clothes, faces, bodies, smiles, gaits, interests, and occupations are manifestly different." Clothing represents ones gender-- if someone were then to wear clothing expected from the opposite sex, they are assumed to be more of that opposite sex. We should not be judging eachother by what we wear. Of course our society has precursors of what a man and a woman should do to keep the world in a constant balance. But HELLO, our world is tilted on an axis!!! We are not balanced and never will be.

Thursday, August 28, 2008

Hello Fellow Bloggers

I am what one would call a blog virgin, I have no experience in this field of technology but am enthusiastic to learn.

In the future I will be posting interesting papers regarding Popular culture and my views on it.

I hope you enjoy this "blog" and look forward to any feedback, but if it is negative, I will delete it; I prefer only positive contributions to anything I take time and effort in creating.